Why universities are failing 6. New assessments

Aditya Chakrabortty has produced a compelling article: 'Mis-sold, expensive and overhyped: why our universities are a con'.  He unpacks a number of promises made by governments of both persuasion (in the UK), promises that have not materialised.  The first was 'that degrees mean inevitably bigger salaries.' But as he points out: 'Britain manufactures graduates by the tonne, but it doesn’t produce nearly enough graduate-level jobs. Nearly half of all graduates languish in jobs that don’t require graduate skills, according to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. In 1979, only 3.5% of new bank and post office clerks had a degree; today it is 35% – to do a job that often pays little more than the minimum wage.'

Aditya Chakrabortty

'Promise number two was that expanding higher education would break down class barriers. Wrong again.' His conclusion: "For everyone’s sake, let us declare this experiment a failure. It is high time that higher education was treated again as a public good, as Jeremy Corbyn recognises with his pledge to scrap tuition fees. But Labour also needs to expand vocational education. And if it really wants to increase social mobility and reduce unfairness, it will need to come up with tax policies fit for the age of inheritance."

In a letter to the Guardian today, Norman Gower, a former OU PVC, affirms the arguments mounted by Chakrabortty in this article.   He alludes to a forthcoming book, 'English Universities in Crisis: Markets Without Competition.'   In contrast Alistair Jarvis, Chief executive, Universities UK, disputes Chakrabortty's analysis and conclusions. Of course he would take this line wouldn't he?  I find it rather disconcerting that he considers that 'Higher education is a public good that delivers societal and personal benefits.'  This framing of HE seems to me to have been thrown out when fees were introduced.

Of course there are universities and there are universities; ones like the OU historically committed to enhancing participation, part time study and life-long learning have a different fit in the ecology of possibilities. These differences need to be borne in mind.  I certainly hope the current  review of post-18 education, launched in early 2018, and chaired by Philip Augar, a leading author and former non-executive director of the Department for Education will have taken a systemic approach to their task e.g. what are the different learning systems that might best comprise a nation's HE sector in this part of the 21st century when the Anthropocene is upon us? There is a lot at stake, including the future of life-long learning, vocational education and tuition fees. Even more important is addressing the social purpose of universities and other socially constructed, citizen supported learning systems.

Peter Checkland's last keynote address

Peter tells me that his Keynote at the 60th Anniversary Conference of the OR Society (UK) will be his last ever.  At 87 I guess that is fair enough. His final talk 'A Pathian shot (friendly)'

What do our pets contribute to the Anthropocene?

Listen to this discussion and find out some of the systemic implications of keeping pets.  Population control enthusiasts may want to bring pets into their frames of reference?

"Geographer Gregory Okin is an insomniac. But what keeps him awake at night is a little unusual. 

Chooks. Not the noise they make. But what they eat. And that got him thinking about the ecological pawprint of what the world serves up to its pets. 

So instead of counting sheep he found himself counting …well…one cat and dog…two cats and dogs…163 million cats and dogs..."

Myopic understandings of leadership and its functioning are pervasive

Commentaries and reactions to the recent failed internal 'coup' within the ruling coalition government in Australia makes it all too clear that pathological views of leadership are widespread.  The mistaken and pervasive belief that a 'good leader' or a 'wise leader' or more commonly a 'powerful leader' who keeps it simple can fix our broken governance systems is alarming. It was thus refreshing to see Pat Campbell's cartoon on Leadership in The Age this morning.

In the same edition damming critiques of what had been variously described as an 'insurgency', 'a coup' or 'an insurrection' have come from former coalition senator Amanda Vanstone and former Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.  Here is a flavour:

"Politics has its share of these types. People who just want it their way all the time. And when that doesn’t happen they eat resentment for breakfast and dine on revenge. They put themselves ahead of the team. Always.

That’s been known about this little band, and it is little, for a long time. But now they’ve shown that this bitter diet has been like a cancer to their competence. They are seen as, among other things, inept and reckless and foolish. Their colleagues see it. The public sees it. It takes a special kind of stupidity to organise a coup that you don’t win, in a sitting week and in a government with a majority of one. If you can’t read the numbers in a small party room how can you read what’s happening out in the real world?"   Amanda Vanstone.

"Abbott has never cared about policy. He has only cared about politics and winning at any cost. I cannot remember a single positive policy initiative that Abbott has championed and then implemented. Not one. As a result, unconstrained by policy, the entire energy of this giant wrecking ball of Australian politics has been focussed on destroying his opponents - within the Labor Party and the Liberal Party. Of all modern politicians, Abbott is sui generis. His singular, destructive impact on national politics cannot be underestimated...........................

Murdoch is also a political bully and a thug who for many years has hired bullies as his editors. The message to Australian politicians is clear: either toe the line on what Murdoch wants or he kills you politically."  Kevin Rudd

Both Vanstone and Rudd begin to approach some of the main reasons why our governance systems are failing, but they do not go nearly far enough in their analysis and identification of options for change.  In all the reportage over the last week the only article I have seen that begins a deeper form of analysis was by Dave Sharma. Sharma has an interesting history - and has just returned from four years as Australia's ambassador to Israel. He has, no less, been touted as a possible candidate for the Liberals in the seat of Wentworth in the forthcoming by-election to replace Malcolm Turnbull.  Given his analysis of the state of our governance systems one would have to question his rationale for joining the highly dysfunctional Liberal party.  Or perhaps he feels he can bring insights from watching, at close quarters, the systemic failings of Israel's espoused democracy?

Action on air pollution with EU support not fast enough - what will it be like post-Brexit?

A new study shows very strong correlations between changes in the heart structure and air pollution:

"Air pollution is linked to changes in the structure of the heart of the sort seen in early stages of heart failure, say researchers.

The finding could help explain the increased number of deaths seen in areas with high levels of dirty air. For example, a report last year revealed that people in the UK are 64 times more likely to die from the effect of air pollution than people living in Sweden. Such premature deaths can be linked to a number of causes including respiratory problems, stroke and coronary artery disease."

This is a major front upon which our governance systems are failing.  As a backdrop this new paper in PNAS, Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene, outlines how vulnerable our situation is, yet despite Paris, we collectively 'fiddle'!

"We explore the risk that self-reinforcing feedbacks could push the Earth System toward a planetary threshold that, if crossed, could prevent stabilization of the climate at intermediate temperature rises and cause continued warming on a “Hothouse Earth” pathway even as human emissions are reduced. Crossing the threshold would lead to a much higher global average temperature than any interglacial in the past 1.2 million years and to sea levels significantly higher than at any time in the Holocene. We examine the evidence that such a threshold might exist and where it might be. If the threshold is crossed, the resulting trajectory would likely cause serious disruptions to ecosystems, society, and economies. Collective human action is required to steer the Earth System away from a potential threshold and stabilize it in a habitable interglacial-like state. Such action entails stewardship of the entire Earth System—biosphere, climate, and societies—and could include decarbonization of the global economy, enhancement of biosphere carbon sinks, behavioral changes, technological innovations, new governance arrangements, and transformed social values.

A systemic language/languaging to talk about and respond to climate change

We already do a lot of talking and languaging more generally about climate change.  We will do a lot more. That is why we have to move to a much more sophisticated use of language than happens at the moment.  Our world may disappear for the want of a much deeper understanding of how language uses us - and how primitive we are in the language we deploy.  George Lakoff has good advice on some of the systemic issues that are becoming more apparent each day w.r.t our languaging.

The rise of gluten sensitivity - an emergent, systemic problem

As someone who has gluten sensitivity I experience the phenomenon as real - but it is complex to manage and deal with socially, as this excellent article in the Guardian outlines.

Not just a fad: the surprising, gut-wrenching truth about gluten

It has become emergent, a systemic issue that needs systems thinking in practice skills and attention by researchers, dieticians, sufferers, and the medical profession.  

On bullied universities speaking truth to power

Jonathan Wolff in his Guardian article yesterday "Britain’s bullied universities should be speaking truth to power" raises some interesting points about New Zealand’s Education Act   .... "that ..gives universities a statutory duty to be “the critic and conscience of society”"  Whilst he offers support for such an institutional arrangement he has little to say about other forms of institutional innovation that might be applied to UK HE.

Wolff offers a critique of academic practice, implying that more than institutional innovation is needed. Consideration of his own reflexive praxis is, however, missing from the article.  In critiques of this type it would be good to see a shift from the abstract to the embodied and personal.

Systemic perspectives on the Murray-Darling Basin

This part photo-essay prepared by the Guardian Australia  is worth exploring.  The invitation by the authors is to: 

"Follow our 3000km journey along the rivers, travelling from inland Queensland to the Murray mouth, to understand where the plan has failed those who live and work on this land".

Enhancing Systems Thinking in Practice at the Workplace

Findings from research made available.

"The eSTEeM project was an 18-month systemic inquiry beginning January 2014 initiated by a core team of 5 academics associated with the production and presentation of the postgraduate programme in Systems Thinking in Practice (STiP). The inquiry comprised a series of online interviews over two phases, and a workshop held in London Regional Office in May 2015.  There were 33 interviews in total, including interviews with 10 postgraduate students undertaking core modules associated with the  STiP programme, 8 STiP alumni, 8 employers of STiP alumni, and 7 Associate Lecturers teaching on the STiP programme.  The one-day workshop involved 41 participants including members of the core eSTEeM team, all interviewees from both initial phases,  along with other special guests invited on the basis of their involvement, support and interest for the STiP programme.

The project aimed to design a learning system for transforming the ‘threats’ of a gap between postgraduate study experiences and post-study work experiences into ‘opportunities’ for radical pedagogic adaptation and (re)design. One such course where the gap is evident is with the postgraduate suite of qualifications in Systems Thinking in Practice (STiP) launched at the OU in 2010."

Teething problems with apprenticeships?

According to an article today on Wonkhe - marking the first year of apprenticeships - some systemic issues are emerging:

"Appy birthday

Friday was the first birthday of the apprenticeship levy, with a veritable fiesta of events to mark the occasion. However, the government’s target of three million starts by 2020 looks seriously at risk, despite claims that all is going “as planned”.

Challenges include demonstrating the benefits to prospective applicants and their families, meeting employer needs, and delays getting new apprenticeships approved. One major employer, IBM, described the process as “incredibly difficult” with “bizarre decisions” and “not a good experience at all”. That same employer also said they have “shifted away from graduates ... which is possibly an unintended consequence".

There are also issues in demonstrating the returns to firms of taking on apprentices – simulations published by the Education Policy Institute to estimate the costs and benefits suggest that most firms would only break even if apprentice pay is close to minimum wage, and that higher-level apprenticeships taken up at a later age could offer lower returns for both apprentices and their employers.

From a standing start, many universities are starting to offer degree apprenticeships, which Gerry Berragan of the Institute for Apprenticeships said he was supportive of. He also said management degrees are a "perfectly respectable" way to use levy funds and address productivity challenges.

Time will tell if the government, the post-18 review, and OfS can create a coherent, system-wide offer that includes different routes and levels. With unspent levy funds and stubborn skills gaps, it’s likely that more enterprising HEIs will continue to seize this opportunity."

The gathering systemic failure of the nation state

You know something's amiss when authors on both sides of the globe write about the same set of phenomena only days apart.  The first to come to my attention was an article by Lachlan Harris and Andrew Charlton in the Sydney Morning Herald: "The fundamental operating model of Australian politics is breaking down". These authors are heading in the right direction.  Unfortunately they do not go nearly far enough and some of their argument along the way is dubious. I refer especially to their claims that: "The effects of polarisation can be seen in the rising support for increasingly ideological minor parties such as the Greens, One Nation and the Australian Conservatives........As the electorate becomes more ideological, those votes are being cast as firm votes for minor parties, not against the major ones."  This framing seems to me to miss the mark, especially when the authors primary experiences are within one of the main parties. We need an open, societal debate about these issues. But with more nuanced framing than these authors provide.

Then today this article by Rana Dasgupta in The Guardian: "The demise of the nation state", as The Long Read. His analysis is more global and, to me, more convincing.  He echos points that Ed Straw and I are currently writing about in a book due with Routledge in August this year.  Dasgupta argues that:
 
"Since 1945, we have actively reduced our world political system to a dangerous mockery of what was designed by US president Woodrow Wilson and many others after the cataclysm of the first world war, and now we are facing the consequences. But we should not leap too quickly into renovation. This system has done far less to deliver human security and dignity than we imagine – in some ways, it has been a colossal failure – and there are good reasons why it is ageing so much more quickly than the empires it replaced"

and goes on to claim that there is no going back, no way of improving the 'current model':

"After so many decades of globalisation, economics and information have successfully grown beyond the authority of national governments. Today, the distribution of planetary wealth and resources is largely uncontested by any political mechanism............Without political innovation, global capital and technology will rule us without any kind of democratic consultation, as naturally and indubitably as the rising oceans."

We shall have to wait - but wait with active attention and personal action if his claims that:

"The libertarian dream – whereby antique bureaucracies succumb to pristine hi-tech corporate systems, which then take over the management of all life and resources – is a more likely vision for the future than any fantasy of a return to social democracy."

will come to pass.  Resistance, in the Foucauldian sense can be harnessed on the back of the Cambridge Analytics and Facebook revelations together with growing critique of the antisocial power of black-box algorithms and hard AI.  But this will require effort and greater solidarity - the very thing offered to the UK by membership of the EU.

From his convincing analysis comes the conclusion that:

"The three elements of the crisis described ... will only worsen. First, the existential breakdown of rich countries during the assault on national political power by global forces. Second, the volatility of the poorest countries and regions, now that the departure of cold war-era strongmen has revealed their true fragility. And third, the illegitimacy of an “international order” that has never aspired to any kind of “society of nations” governed by the rule of law."

 I could not agree more with his conclusions that action on our part "is not a small endeavour: it will take the better part of this century. We do not know yet where it will lead. All we can lay out now is a set of directions." His suggested actions include:

• global financial regulation. 
• global flexible democracy
• finding new conceptions of citizenship

These are challenging agendas. Do they go far enough? I fear they are necessary but not sufficient.  So what would I add?  Please wait for the book.

The systemic implications of algorithms

Virginia Eubanks, a professor of political science at the University at Albany in upstate New York is the author of several books that seem well worth reading: Automating Inequality:How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor; Digital Dead End: Fighting for Social Justice in the Information Age; and is co-editor, with Alethia Jones, of Ain’t Gonna Let Nobody Turn Me Around: Forty Years of Movement Building with Barbara Smith. It was while she was writing her latest book book that the power of algorithms became shockingly evident.  She is interviewed on BBC's 'The Why Factor' in this compelling clip: How do you fight a nameless, faceless algorithm? This clip is in turn part of a larger program on the BBC World Service called: Machines and Morals.

Taking Steven Pinker to task

Good on George Monbiot for deflating the celebrity bubble that has grown around Steven Pinker's work.

'Rather than using primary sources, Pinker draws on anecdote, cherry-picking and discredited talking points developed by anti-environmental thinktanks.Take, for example, Pinker’s claims about the landmark Limits to Growth report, published in 1972. It’s a favourite target of those who seek to dismiss environmental problems. He suggests it projected that aluminium, copper, chromium, gold, nickel, tin, tungsten and zinc would be exhausted by 1992. It is hard to see how anyone who had read the report could form this impression. The figures it uses for illustrative purposes have been transformed by some critics into projections.

Its actual prediction is that “the great majority of the currently important non-renewable resources will be extremely costly 100 years from now”. It would be perfectly reasonable to take issue with this claim. It is not reasonable to recycle, then attack, a widely circulated myth about the report. That’s called the straw man fallacy. It is contrary to the principles of reason that Pinker claims to champion.'

More on the systemic failings of universities/H.E.

From a despondent Peter Scott in an article today called:  'Don’t let this university wrecking government masquerade as reformers'

'The fees and funding system in England is certainly bust.'

' English higher education is too expensive. It is the most expensive public system of higher education in the world (including the US).'

Duality, Dualism, Duelling and Brexit

Ed Straw and I have had an essay published on Open Democracy which explores the systemic implications of the current 'Brexit Mess' (in the sense that Russ Ackoff referred to messes). The article is an elaboration of a letter sent to Jeremy Corbyn, Keir Starmer and Emily Thornberry.

Paul Mason provides a systemic account of 'fake news'

British commentator and radio personality Paul Mason uses a form of modified system dynamics modelling to analyse and explain  the systemic implications and functioning of 'fake news'

New on-line taster course on systems thinking

Colleagues at the Institute for Sustainable Futures (university of Technology, Sydney) have advised:

 

"that the first module of the systems thinking course I mentioned we were developing is now available online at UTS OPEN. It’s  ISF’s first ever online course and is one of the first four UTS courses available to the general public free of charge. We’ve tried not to replicate all the good work that’s already out there including the OU’s course and are hoping to offer some different angles on systems thinking. Let us know what you think if you get a chance to have a look at it. The course is an introduction or ’taster course' on systems thinking and you can find it here at this link https://open.uts.edu.au/systemsthinking.html .  We will hopefully be developing another 4 modules to complete this course (dependent on further funding).

 

Please feel free to share the link with anyone who might be interested. This is still a ‘soft launch’ phase and we can still make improvements to the course and would really appreciate any honest and constructive feedback on how we can further improve it. As this is only a ‘taster’ module it is meant to get people interested in systems thinking and wanting more. "

Systemic Design

Ben Sweeting gave a plenary presentation at the Relating Systems Thinking and Design conference in Oslo, in October 2017, on Cybernetics, Virtue Ethics and Design. It is available from the proceedings and includes a video recording, which features live sketch notes from playthink.com

Eulogy: Phil Wallis (5th March 1982 - 2nd February 2018)

My dear friend and colleague Phil Wallis died on the 2nd of February after an 18 month struggle with bowel cancer.  His funeral was held at the Springvale Botanical Cemetery on Thursday 8th February.  This eulogy delivered at Phil's invitation was one of two tributes paid during the service.   The final reading was delivered by Phil's mother - 'A wish for you my child'.
 

Eulogy: Phillip J. Wallis

5^th March 1982 – 2^nd February 2018

I feel immensely privileged to have been invited by Phil to deliver this eulogy.  Unlike other eulogies I delivered for my parents whom I also loved this is my first experience of having discussed possible content in advance. The conversation with Phil was for me a heart-wrenching experience. But true to form Phil was strong in the circumstances – considerate and concerned for me through my tears.   My aim today is to leave you with a stronger sense of Phil the professional.  Much of the detail of his professional life is in the document available when you entered.  I invite you to read this when you can and as you do to marvel at how much Phil achieved in the 10 years of his post-PhD professional life.  It is indeed impressive and stands as a legacy worthy of celebration.  At the end Phil felt comfortable within himself with what he had achieved, though it would be better to reframe his contributions in terms of what he contributed to us, his colleagues and friends, and society more generally.  

Phil began his academic life at the interface of geography and chemistry.  He graduated with first-class honours and won a prestigious scholarship to continue at Monash for his PhD in the emerging field of green chemistry.  But he had interdisciplinary and then transdisciplinary tendencies.  His interdisciplinary interests began within UNIWATER, a Monash- Melbourne Uni collaboration, and later in the Systemic Governance Research Program at Monash.  It was in these two programs that our collaboration began. 

Phil was open to the complexity and uncertainty of the world around him and felt that research that acted at the interface of the social and natural sciences was important for long term sustainability.  This led him to do pioneering research with people – collaborative research, systemic co-inquiry or co-design. He became known for his expertise in process design in research and stakeholder engagement and for his excellent facilitator skills.  This was a brave turn to make in a world where disciplinary focus is more readily rewarded.  Writing last year Phil justifiably claimed ‘expertise in many facets of sustainability research with a proven track record in communicating results by seminar and publication’. 

Phil’s academic work has been cited by about 400 people, mostly since 2013. In other words his research has had a significant international and national impact which will continue for some time to come.  In one of his most recent papers a self-description is that of ‘an applied, transdisciplinary researcher and natural resource management practitioner’.

When Phil and I talked about this eulogy and our decade-long collaboration two particular experiences came to the fore in our reflections.  For Phil it was a visit we made together to Canberra in November 2014. We first attended a Peter Cullen Trust seminar and dinner. We listened to John Hewson deliver an enlightening after-dinner talk.  John argued that investors were ignoring the growing risk of fossil fuel investments, and [that] portfolios [were] highly skewed towards oil, coal and petrol stocks rather than being balanced with commodities carrying less long-term risk.’ We both admired Hewson for his commitment to the divestment movement. The following day we had meetings at the National Water Commission and the Murray Darling Basin Authority or MDBA as we called it.  At the latter we mounted arguments to allow our earlier research conducted within the MDBA to be published. Despite our arguments they denied permission and continue to do so.  Our research spoke truth to power; if taken on-board the results may well have avoided the current series of systemic failings in governance of the Murray Darling Basin.

Why was this experience significant to Phil? Well he was very proud to have been made a fellow of the Peter Cullen Trust. The regard with which he is held within this network is testimony not only to his quiet leadership skills, his behind the scenes facilitation, but also for his integrity and the understanding he has gained, and helped to develop, of the complex policy and practice issues that confront water, river, climate change, biodiversity, food security and natural resource governance in Australia and beyond.  It was also a visit in which we were in the thick of it doing our best to make research relevant to policy and practice.

For my own part the memory that surfaced was of hiking with Phil and John Colvin in the Turgela Gorge in the beautiful Drakensburgs in Sth Africa. Both Phil and I wrote blog-posts about the experience. Phil wrote:

“Just recently a book chapter project came to fruition……The book had its genesis in the 2012 International Conference on Fresh Water Governance for Sustainable Development, held in Drakensberg, South Africa. This conference was memorable for me as I had the opportunity to collaborate with Derick du Toit, Sharon Pollard, Harry Biggs, John Colvin, and Ray Ison in preparing an interactive special session on systemic governance.  The conference was also a good chance to see the amazing landscapes of the Drakensberg region, including a hike up Tugela Gorge.’ 

What Phil did not write, perhaps in deference to concerns Beth or his mother may have held, was encounteringmassive lightning storms – the night following our walk in the midst of a storm the hotel management would not let us walk the 100 metres or so back from dinner to our bungalow. Why we asked? The answer: because one of their clients had been killed by lightening some months before.

As Phil would have done when charged with undertaking a project – even a eulogy – I have sought to give voice to others, to value multiple partial perspectives as to how Phil was experienced in his professional life.  The Phil that emerges from this albeit limited selection is:

(i)                Phil the mapper out of ideas, the planner, synthesiser, systems diagram user, who could sit quietly in meetings and at a critical stage offer his model, diagram or synthesis that ‘wowed’ those present! “Starting out not really knowing where we were going to go, Phil would be there with whiteboard pens in hand, and pretty soon the discussions would take off, ideas would flow and bounce around, the inspiration would come, and the maps would grow and spread out. “

(ii)              Phil the calm and unassuming leader - always able to bring people along with him. One example was when he worked with a group of fellow early-career researchers to write a collaborative paper about their experiences. It was Phil's ability to connect with people in both an intellectual and personal way and lead a group that really made it come together. All of his co-authors from this experience have been in touch with me and offered similar reflections.  One said: ‘he had a big effect on my career … because he elevated my confidence and made me feel empowered at a time when I was doubting myself a lot.’

(iii)            Phil the great collaborator: supportive, patient, highly organised technologically adept and generous. No matter what was happening he seemed to be able to take it in his stride.

(iv)            Phil the 'doer' - he put in the effort to turn ideas into reality and he did it through quiet thoughtful leadership and gentle guidance rather than an overbearing personality as is the case with a lot of ambitious people who get things done but fail to pay attention to fostering inclusive relationships. He was organised, meticulous in his research and kind in his dealings with people.

(v)              Phil the fantastic facilitator, inspirational in demonstrating a collaborative way of working together.

(vi)            Phil the unflappable …..in the face of we older CSIRO scientists’ cynicism about social learning through online collaborative platforms he helped lead us to wrest some science out of our apathy.’

(vii)          Phil the humourist.’ It was very subtle but always present. Like how he wrote that book chapter called 'a nexus of nexuses', he was kind of having fun with the whole thing but not making a big deal out of it’.

(viii)        Phil the ever positive - smiling and always looking for better ways of doing things.

(ix)            Phil the initiator and facilitator of good conversations: ‘he rounded up our team and whisked us off in search of some good coffee on campus and there we sat talking all things sometimes political, sometimes about what we were reading for pleasure, the ethics of food, and what our fellow colleagues were up to in the water governance space’ 

(x)              Phil the attentive supervisor, supporter and advisor always happy to discuss; caring, compassionate and consistent;

(xi)            Phil the technology pioneer and enabler: ‘Phil emailed a certain professor that a number of references were available on the cloud. To a distracted busy person who only half read the email, the idea of references on freshwater being in the cloud  made sense in a weird sort of way that did not have much to do with computing. After acknowledging mystification Phil patiently explained but sent all the files on email instead.’ 

(xii)          Phil the exemplar of doing systemic thinking as an everyday practice - as a way of shaping your thoughts as a web of ideas and views, which spurs you on to make further connections that helps you think in a more inclusive way’

(xiii)        Phil the work-life-balance manager – assiduous in his concerns for equity with his partner Beth, for the efficacy of their parenting team and his commitments to Archer and Hugo;

(xiv)        Phil - the loss to us all – ‘so much potential yet unused to make a difference.  And a beautiful spirit and intellect lost when so many that are bad and destructive go on and on.’ 

Phil would not have liked the fuss.  But at this moment all of these facets of Phil, as well as others not yet said, deserve a public saying and acknowledgment.

Let me finish by saying that in my experience Phil Wallis was an easy man to love.  When I say this I do not mean a Hollywood, romantic, version of love but the type of love that arises when we treat others, including nature with legitimacy.  Phil was an easy man to love because he made it so easy to reciprocate the legitimacy, the love, he granted each of us when we worked, collaborated, talked, facilitated, traveled, wrote, speculated and laughed together.  There was no humbug about Phil.  He was the real deal.  In our final conversation he counseled me to go on asking challenging questions.  This is an invitation I extend to you all on Phil’s behalf because we each contribute to the world that Archer, Hugo and others will inherit. Phil did more than his fair share; we owe it to him to continue his legacy.

Ray Ison

8^th February 2018

With contributions from:

Lee Godden	Naomi Rubenstein	Irene Kelly	S. Davidson
Nikki Reichelt	Patricia Geraghty	Ian Morgans	Chris Blackmore
Ben Iaquinto	Monika Farnbach	Helen Corney	Kevin Collins
Moragh Mackay	James Patterson	Ross Colliver	Sharon Pollard
Jana Paschen	Brian Coffey	Catherine Allan	Derick du Toit
Katherine Daniell	Laura Mumaw	Harry Biggs	John Colvin
Yongping Wei	Anna Lukasiewicz	Jocelyn Davies	Ashley Sparrow
Jasmyn Lynch	Liz Gachenga	Tony McLeod	Jason Alexandra
Nadine Gaskell	Robyn Holder	Nicky Ison	Cathy Humphreys

 

  With Phil and John Colvin on a walk out from Montusi Mountain Lodge, the Drakensburgs, South Africa in 2012.